Polish Journal of Public Health

Original Article, Pol J Public Health, Vol. 134 (2024): 65-68

Marek Tomków1, Radosław Jerzy Balwierz¹, Adam Majewski², Aleksandra Szopa³

¹ Department of Pharmacy and Ecological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Opole, Poland
² Laboratory of Medical and Pharmaceutical Law, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
³ Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

 10.12923/2083-4829/2024-0014

© 2024 Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonComercial-No Derivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)

Abstract

Emergency contraception in Poland is often referred to as the “morning-after pill”. Its legal status has changed many times. In Poland, it has only been available on prescription since 2017. Attempts have been made to change the legal status in 2024. A draft amendment to the Pharmaceutical Act was then submitted to Parliament. However, the bill was vetoed by the President of the Republic of Poland. In response to the veto, the Minister of Health issued a decree on a pilot programme in the field of pharmacists’ services related to reproductive health. In connection with this regulation, a question arose for pharmacists: whether it is necessary to obtain the consent of the legal guardian of minors who want to use the programme. Therefore, the aim of the work was a legal-comparative and dogmatic-legal analysis of legal acts in the field of reproductive health. A review of the data shows that while the pharmacist carries out the activities indicated in the pilot programme for pharmacist services about reproductive health, health services are provided to patients. Therefore, in the case of minor patients under 16 years of age, or who are over 16 but under 18 years of age, the consent of their legal representatives is required. It should also be noted that the term “pharmacist service” used in the title is not defined in any way in the law (unlike the term “pharmaceutical service”) and does not constitute a definition that would allow the statement to be made that it is another unlisted activity that exempts the pharmacist from the obligation to obtain the consent of the legal guardian. It should therefore be assumed that this consent is necessary to provide the service.

Keywords: emergency contraception, pharmacist service, pharmaceutical service, legislation, morning-after pill.